https://chinabridgegroup.co.uk/
Ryan Family Professor of Human Rights Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, and Carol K. Pforzheimer Professor, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; author, The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics
In this strikingly original and meticulously researched book, Dr. Zachary Kaufman argues that the United States has led in the creation of some crucial international criminal tribunals for prudential reasons. The book provides essential insights for all interested in preventing mass atrocity, most importantly that war crimes tribunals have been and can be a prudent policy option for the United States.
Mayer Brown/Robert A. Helman Professor of Law, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law; the first U.S. Ambassador at Large for War Crimes Issues; author, All the Missing Souls: A Personal History of the War Crimes Tribunals
Dr. Zachary Kaufman dissects, from the perspective of United States foreign policy, the design and establishment of four historic war crimes tribunals—Nuremberg, Tokyo, the former Yugoslavia, and Rwanda—and explains why they embodied uniquely crafted means of transitional justice. Dr. Kaufman’s analytical premise for U.S. policy towards accountability for atrocity crimes is prudentialism, which he introduces as a blending of normative beliefs, politics, and pragmatics. Sometimes, however, that cocktail fails to result in a criminal tribunal, such as for Libya and Iraq following the end of the Cold War. Dr. Kaufman, a rising scholar, has written a tour de force that sets the stage for future tribunals and non-judicial approaches to transitional justice in a turbulent world.
Lafayette S. Foster Professor of Law, Yale Law School
Dr. Zachary Kaufman is an astute scholar and experienced practitioner on transitional justice issues. Through detailed, original research, he uncovers the factors driving U.S. policymaking on transitional justice. This important book—compellingly written, meticulously documented, and persuasively argued—is a must-read for anyone interested in international law, international relations, human rights, and U.S. foreign policy.
first Chief Prosecutor, International Criminal Court; Senior Fellow, Jackson Institute for Global Affairs, Yale University
Why does the United States not consistently embrace prosecution for mass atrocities committed abroad? Dr. Zachary Kaufman has made a seminal contribution to this topic with this superbly well-documented and argued book. He improves our understanding of transitional justice, international governance, and U.S. foreign policy. The 2010 and 2015 U.S. National Security Strategies state that preventing mass atrocities is a responsibility that all nations share. Following in Dr. Kaufman’s footsteps, we should seek to understand the transitional justice policies of China, India, Russia, and the one hundred liberal states parties to the International Criminal Court.
Simeon E. Baldwin Professor Emeritus of Law, Yale Law School
Dr. Zachary Kaufman is at the forefront of the transitional justice movement in the international sphere. His scholarship, his work experience with the U.S. government and three war crimes tribunals, and his personal philanthropy in Rwanda and elsewhere inform his new book, taking it out of the ivory tower and into the human and institutional wreckage left by crimes against humanity.
Manley O. Hudson Professor of Law and Faculty Director, Institute for Global Law and Policy, Harvard Law School
United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice is a thought provoking study of postwar U.S. foreign policy concerning transitional justice, useful for students of diplomatic history, international law, and international relations alike. Dr. Zachary Kaufman examines U.S. support for international criminal tribunals and other transitional justice options to address atrocities abroad in the aftermath of World War II and the Cold War, arguing that U.S. policy is best explained by ‘prudential factors’ that mix law, pragmatism, and politics.
Li Ka Shing Professor of Political Science, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore; former Professor of International Relations and Professorial Fellow of Nuffield College, University of Oxford
Dr. Zachary Kaufman’s book makes an important contribution to our understanding of the how’s and why’s of America’s transitional justice policies. His “prudentialism” account of the making of U.S. transitional justice policies is deftly executed, backed up by substantial primary sources, and, ultimately, persuasive. A superb achievement.
Professor and Chair in International Relations, European University Institute; Senior Research Fellow, Somerville College, University of Oxford; Special Adviser to the UN Secretary-General on the Responsibility to Protect
In United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice, Dr. Zachary Kaufman offers a historically-rich and nuanced account of how the U.S. government has addressed perpetrators of the most serious international crimes from 1945 up to the present day. He reminds us that the prosecution of alleged perpetrators has not always been the first or only preference of the U.S., and that its behaviour has been shaped less by a principled commitment to the rule of law, and more by a case-specific balancing of normative beliefs on the one hand, and pragmatic and political considerations on the other. The result has been an inconsistent pattern of transitional justice responses that combines prosecution with amnesty, and unilateral with multilateral action. At a time when both international organisations and national governments are trying to bring perpetrators of atrocity crimes to justice, and when the project of international criminal justice itself is under scrutiny, this book is an important resource for understanding the motivations and track record of U.S. law and policy.
Ernst C. Stiefel Chair of Comparative Law, New York Law School; author, Transitional Justice and Globalizing Transitional Justice
Illuminating and trenchant, Dr. Zachary Kaufman’s book takes us behind the scenes and sheds needed light on the high stakes policymaking guiding the U.S. role in transitional justice and humanitarian intervention.
Former Chief of Prosecutions, UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda; former Chief Prosecutor, Special Court for Sierra Leone; former U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice
Dr. Zachary Kaufman’s original research and first-rate analysis deepen our understanding of the role played by the United States in establishing international criminal tribunals. His book casts new light on the interplay of politics, pragmatism, and the declared support for international norms in making the policy decisions to submit alleged perpetrators ‘to the judgment of the law.
Professor of Human Rights and International Criminal Law, University of Leiden; author, The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute and Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals; former Commissioner, Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission
This important, original, and unique contribution to the literature on transitional justice examines one of its foremost practitioners, the United States, starting with the post-Second World War context in Germany and Japan to the challenges of Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and the modern day. Profound new insights, of relevance to many parts of the world, emerge from such a compelling comparative approach.
Director, International Security Program, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; Editor-in-Chief, International Security
In a world of recurrent barbarism, should perpetrators of atrocities be held accountable and, if so, how should they be brought to justice? In this thoughtful and impressively researched volume, Dr. Zachary Kaufman explores how American policymakers have sought to grapple with this vexing question. Dr. Kaufman provides a comprehensive analysis of transitional justice options and detailed analysis of six major cases, showing how politics and practical factors have shaped the impact of normative and legal considerations in American policy on transitional justice. This is an important argument, well made.
Clinical Professor of Law and Director, Orville H. Schell, Jr. Center for International Human Rights, Yale Law School
In a world that has accepted international criminal justice as law’s predominant response to mass atrocity, Dr. Zachary Kaufman presents a valuable realist perspective on the factors, political and pragmatic, that influence state choices to pursue justice, via prosecutions, for the gravest episodes of abuse. Through succinct but well-documented and revealing accounts of U.S. decisions to support the key specialized international tribunals since World War II, this book analyzes considerations that affected those decisions and their inconsistencies and contradictions.
Director, Genocide Studies Program, and Lecturer, Department of Political Science, Yale University
United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics offers a magnificent and detailed examination of the domestic and international politics of international criminal tribunals, from Nuremberg and Tokyo to Arusha and The Hague. Dr. Zachary Kaufman shows that not only does the study of such tribunals and other transitional justice mechanisms belong in the realm of international relations, but it can also inform international relations theory itself.
Co-Director, Centre for the International Politics of Conflict, Rights and Justice, and Associate Professor in International Relations, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
An important contribution to our understanding of the politics of international criminal justice. Dr. Zachary Kaufman emphasizes the calculations that American leaders made about the costs and benefits of backing war crime tribunals in the aftermath of the Second World War. These same cost-benefit calculations have continued to shape America’s choices in this increasingly prominent foreign policy domain.
Edward B. Burling Professor of International Law and Diplomacy, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University; President, International Law Association; former U.S. member, United Nations Human Rights Committee
Dr. Zachary Kaufman has provided an intricate examination of attempts to restore the rule of law after war and regime collapse. Selectivity of prosecutions, the loss of interest by sponsoring states, and the stubbornness of regime habits are all part of the problem that Dr. Kaufman tackles, in the hope of doing it better next time around.
Reader in Comparative and International Politics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London; co-founder, Oxford Transitional Justice Research, University of Oxford
Dr. Zachary Kaufman’s excellent book highlights the United States’ complicated role in legal approaches to transitional justice since the Second World War. While the United States has refused to sign the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, it has consistently supported—and often catalyzed—international justice efforts across the globe. The six cases in this book draw on unprecedented interviews with elite actors and documents unearthed through Freedom of Information Act requests. These materials highlight not only the profound influence of the United States in prosecuting atrocity perpetrators but also the impact of international justice on U.S. policymaking and practice. This book is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand why international criminal law persists today as a central component of transitional justice, despite major setbacks since Nuremberg and Tokyo, and the key role of the United States in encouraging international trials.
Deputy United Nations Director, Human Rights Watch
Dr. Zachary Kaufman pierces the legalist bubble that has dominated our understanding of U.S involvement in transitional justice globally. Highlighting the extensive deliberations about other options, like extrajudicial killings, and emphasizing the undeniably political factors driving pragmatic policymakers, Dr. Kaufman challenges those who would suggest that a normative commitment to justice was the defining factor in the American response to atrocities.